From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 10, 1996
670 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-1690.

April 10, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Joe Wild, Acting Circuit Judge.

Donald Goines, Bowling Green, pro se.

No brief for appellee.


We reverse the trial court's refusal to continue an evidentiary hearing on a rule 3.850 motion at the defendant's request to obtain counsel. See Williams v. State, 472 So.2d 738 (Fla. 1985). On remand, if the court should find that defendant is indigent and unable to obtain private counsel, the trial court shall exercise its discretion under Williams as to the appointment of counsel. We remind the trial judge that, an evidentiary hearing having previously been required on this particular, pending rule 3.850 motion, see Goines v. State, 632 So.2d 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), three of the four Williams criteria for the appointment of counsel have already been satisfied.

REVERSED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Goines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 10, 1996
670 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Goines v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD GOINES, APPELLANT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 10, 1996

Citations

670 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Goines v. State

We then reversed that decision, remanding to consider whether he was indigent for the purpose of appointment…