From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 24, 1964
327 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 9210.

Argued January 21, 1964.

Decided January 24, 1964.

Harry DuMont, Asheville, N.C. (Uzzell DuMont, Asheville, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

Harold K. Bennett, Asheville, N.C., for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge.


We agree with the District Court that a private automobile being driven from the place of business of the owner by a garage keeper to his garage for the purpose of effecting repairs requested by the owner was not being "used in the automobile business" within the meaning of an exclusion clause in the owner's liability insurance policy.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 24, 1964
327 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Frank H. GOFORTH, Appellee, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 24, 1964

Citations

327 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Western Casualty Surety Company v. Verhulst

" In their reply brief appellants contends that even if it could be said that an automobile business…

MFA Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

For the foregoing reasons, it is my opinion that a customer's automobile in the custody or possession of an…