From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godwin v. Justice Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 25, 2019
No. 75624 (Nev. App. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 75624

01-25-2019

VICTORIA-JOY GODWIN, Appellant, v. JUSTICE COURT OF CLARK COUNTY; SENIOR GARDEN APARTMENTS; AND RUSSELL N. RICCIARDELLI, Respondents.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Victoria-Joy Godwin appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment in a matter seeking injunctive relief. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge.

Godwin filed a complaint against respondents seeking an injunction regarding a related justice court eviction matter and alleging various errors or improprieties during that eviction matter. The eviction matter was instituted by respondent Russell Ricciardelli, the landlord of respondent Senior Garden Apartments. In the eviction matter, an eviction was granted and upheld on appeal to the district court. Respondents moved for summary judgment arguing that the claims were barred by preclusion principles, particularly claim preclusion. The motion was granted and this appeal followed.

This court reviews orders granting summary judgment de novo. Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729, 121 P.3d 1026, 1029 (2005). Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and all other evidence on file demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. When deciding a summary judgment motion, all evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Id.

While Godwin raises multiple issues on appeal, none provide a basis for relief, as our review of the record reveals that claim preclusion was correctly applied to bar appellant's claims, and therefore, summary judgment was proper. See Weddell v. Sharp, 131 Nev. 233, 241, 350 P.3d 80, 85 (2015) (setting forth the elements of claim preclusion); see also Wood, 121 Nev. at 729, 121 P.3d at 1029. Accordingly, we

We have considered Godwin's arguments challenging the denial of her motion for a preliminary injunction and conclude they do not provide a basis for relief.

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, A.C.J.

Douglas

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge

Victoria-Joy Godwin

Attorney General/Carson City

Law Offices of Karl H. Smith/Las Vegas

Edward D. Kania

Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Godwin v. Justice Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 25, 2019
No. 75624 (Nev. App. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Godwin v. Justice Court

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA-JOY GODWIN, Appellant, v. JUSTICE COURT OF CLARK COUNTY; SENIOR…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. 75624 (Nev. App. Jan. 25, 2019)