From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 13, 2015
108 A.3d 28 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 334 WAL 2014

01-13-2015

Mary E. GLOVER, Individually and on Behalf of other similarly situated former and current homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C., a New Jersey Debt Collector, Respondent.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

(1) Does Act 6, § 502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute establishes, against any statutorily defined “person” collecting statutorily prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?

The Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED as moot.


Summaries of

Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 13, 2015
108 A.3d 28 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:Mary E. GLOVER, Individually and on Behalf of other similarly situated…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

108 A.3d 28 (Pa. 2015)

Citing Cases

Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.

This Court granted the appeal to resolve whether Section 502 of Act 6 provides a remedy against any “person”…

Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.

This Court granted the appeal to resolve whether Section 502 of Act 6 provides a remedy against any "person"…