From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gloucester Engineering, Inc. v. Mendoza

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 27, 1986
489 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-364.

May 27, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Donald E. Stone, J.

Peters, Pickle, Flynn Niemoeller and Jeffrey A. Mowers, Miami, for appellant.

Hershoff Levy and Jay Levy, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


Since strict compliance with the substituted service statute is required, the order denying the motion to dismiss and to quash service of process is reversed for failure of the plaintiff to timely file the affidavit of compliance with the statute governing substituted service upon nonresidents. § 48.161(1), Fla. Stat. (1985); Smith v. Import Birds, Inc., 461 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Shiffman v. Stumpff, 445 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). This holding is without prejudice to the plaintiff's procuring alias process and attempting proper service thereof.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Gloucester Engineering, Inc. v. Mendoza

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 27, 1986
489 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Gloucester Engineering, Inc. v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:GLOUCESTER ENGINEERING, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 27, 1986

Citations

489 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Wyatt v. Haese

Perfection of substituted service requires strict compliance with the statutory prerequisites because such…

Winterthur Intern., Ltd. v. Palacios

Winterthur also contends, and the insured concedes, that the insured did not strictly comply with the…