From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glisson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 21, 1987
353 S.E.2d 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

73793.

DECIDED JANUARY 21, 1987.

Child molestation, etc. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Seeliger.

Michael M. Sheffield, for appellant.

Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Elisabeth G. MacNamara, Thomas Morgan III, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


Nathan Glisson appeals from his convictions of child molestation and statutory rape contending that it was error for the trial court to permit the jury to convict him of both offenses as they constituted multiple prosecution for the same crime and that the court further erred in the charge on child molestation.

1. The appellant is correct in his assertion that it was error to convict him of child molestation and statutory rape for the same conduct. He may be prosecuted for both offenses, but he may not be convicted of both. Coker v. State, 164 Ga. App. 493 ( 297 S.E.2d 68) (1982); Lamar v. State, 243 Ga. 401 ( 254 S.E.2d 353) (1979). The error in the instant case was harmless, however, because the trial court merged the offenses at sentencing and he was sentenced only on the statutory rape count which was the greater offense.

2. As his conviction for child molestation was rendered void by the merger of offenses at sentencing, his enumeration of error as to the correctness of the court's charge on child molestation is rendered moot.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 21, 1987.


Summaries of

Glisson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 21, 1987
353 S.E.2d 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Glisson v. State

Case Details

Full title:GLISSON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 21, 1987

Citations

353 S.E.2d 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
181 Ga. App. 585

Citing Cases

Mackey v. State

Sartin v. State, 223 Ga. App. 759, 761-762 (4) ( 479 S.E.2d 354) (1996); see Walthour v. State, 269 Ga. 396,…

Hoover v. State

2. Appellants contend that the evidence was insufficient to authorize their convictions for unlawful assembly…