From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 20, 1976
540 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 74-2326.

July 20, 1976.

Ernest M. Thayer, of Carroll, Burdick McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Guy O. Kornblum and William D. Hunter, of Pettit, Evers Martin, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Charles B. Renfrew, J.

Before ELY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.

Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation.


OPINION


Upon the basis of the very carefully reasoned "MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER", written by District Judge Renfrew and reported at 71 F.R.D. 1 (N.D. Cal. 1976), the District Court's judgment is

Another of Judge Renfrew's opinions that pertains to the controversy is reported at 344 F. Supp. 517 (N.D.Cal. 1972).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 20, 1976
540 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:HAZEL L. GLESENKAMP, APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 20, 1976

Citations

540 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Wardell v. City of Chicago

Leave of court to file an amended complaint is not appropriate when amendment is sought to avoid the adverse…

United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.

Toyobo cites precedent suggesting that "[a] plaintiff . . . cannot be permitted to 'circumvent the effects of…