From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gleichauf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 12, 1976
334 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-1379.

June 11, 1976. Rehearing Denied July 12, 1976.

Appeal from the Broward County Circuit Court, John H. Moore, II, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief, App. Div., and Carl W. Pittman, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.


Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation. At the revocation hearing defendant was charged with issuing a worthless check. Defendant pleaded not guilty. This hearing for violation of probation was a critical stage of the proceeding against defendant and he was, at the least, entitled to the representation of retained counsel. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). Here defendant was effectively denied his right to counsel.

The finding of guilt on the violation of probation and the court's adjudication of guilt and sentence are reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WALDEN, C.J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Gleichauf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 12, 1976
334 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Gleichauf v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN L. GLEICHAUF, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 12, 1976

Citations

334 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Watts v. State

A hearing for violation of probation is a critical stage in a proceeding against a defendant. Gleichauf v.…

State v. Young

As criminal defendants had an "unqualified" federal due process right to retained counsel at trial at a time…