From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gleason v. Wood

U.S.
May 13, 1912
224 U.S. 679 (1912)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

No. 575.

Argued February 23, 1912. Decided May 13, 1912.

Decided on authority of Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 665. 28 Okla. 502, reversed.

THE facts, which involve the taxability of Choctaw allotments in Oklahoma, are stated in the opinion.

Mr. Willard L. Sturdevant and Mr. David C. McCurtain, with whom Mr. Edward P. Hill was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Charles West, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, for defendants in error.


The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are Choctaws owning homesteads and surplus granted under the terms of the Atoka Agreement. Their applications to enjoin the officers of the State of Oklahoma from assessing their lands for taxation for the year 1909 was denied. All of the questions involved are disposed of by the decision in Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 665. The judgment, therefore, is reversed and the case remanded with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Gleason v. Wood

U.S.
May 13, 1912
224 U.S. 679 (1912)
Case details for

Gleason v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:GLEASON v . WOOD, COUNTY TREASURER OF PITTSBURG COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 13, 1912

Citations

224 U.S. 679 (1912)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Gleason

" 3. INDIAN ALLOTMENTS. Affirmed upon the authority of Choate v. Trapp, 224 U.S. 664, 32 Sup. Ct. 565, 56…

Board of Com'rs of Creek Co. v. Bartlett

not rendering judgment in their favor upon the agreed statement of facts. The plaintiff, H.U. Bartlett, in…