From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glancy v. Sacramento County

California Court of Appeals, Third District
May 13, 1971
17 Cal.App.3d 504 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion


17 Cal.App.3d 504 94 Cal.Rptr. 864 Leonard L. GLANCY and Susanne Marie Haines, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Respondent. Leonard L. GLANCY and Susanne Marie Haines, Petitioners and Appellants, v. The MUNICIPAL COURT FOR the SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL COURT DISTRICT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; The PEOPLE of the State of California, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Clarence REYNOLDS, Kathleen Rose Gaines, and Marsha Gean McNabb, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Respondent. Civ. 12529, 12530, 12605. California Court of Appeal, Third District May 13, 1971.

Opinions on pages 499 to 529 omitted.

HEARINGS GRANTED


Summaries of

Glancy v. Sacramento County

California Court of Appeals, Third District
May 13, 1971
17 Cal.App.3d 504 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Glancy v. Sacramento County

Case Details

Full title:Leonard L. GLANCY and Susanne Marie Haines, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: May 13, 1971

Citations

17 Cal.App.3d 504 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)
94 Cal. Rptr. 864

Citing Cases

Jads, Inc. v. Detroit

Our disposition of this appeal makes it unnecessary, however, for us to reach the constitutional questions.…

Yauch v. State

The foregoing rules are subject to the caveat that if a First Amendment right to freedom of speech or…