From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gladstein v. Goldfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 11, 2016
136 A.3d 645 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

05-11-2016

Ruth GLADSTEIN v. Sarann GOLDFIELD et al.

Daniel J. Klau, Hartford, in support of the petition. Louis B. Blumenfeld, Hartford, and Lawrence J. Merly, Bridgeport, in opposition.


Daniel J. Klau, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Louis B. Blumenfeld, Hartford, and Lawrence J. Merly, Bridgeport, in opposition.

Opinion

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 163 Conn.App. 579, 137 A.3d 60 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue: “In view of our recent decision in Fairfield Merrittview Ltd. Partnership v. Norwalk, 320 Conn. 535, 133 A.3d 140 (2016), did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the trial court's order denying the plaintiff's motion to substitute and consequent judgment of dismissal on the basis of the plaintiffs lack of standing?”


Summaries of

Gladstein v. Goldfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 11, 2016
136 A.3d 645 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

Gladstein v. Goldfield

Case Details

Full title:Ruth GLADSTEIN v. Sarann GOLDFIELD et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 11, 2016

Citations

136 A.3d 645 (Conn. 2016)
321 Conn. 914

Citing Cases

Gladstein v. Goldfield

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following question: "In view…