Summary
finding defendant could not be liable in negligence where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that defendant was negligent in making any of the requested repairs, or that defendant had a contract with plaintiff's employer for routine or systematic maintenance of the machine, stating, “[defendant] as an independent repairer/contractor, had no duty to install safety devices or warn plaintiff's employer of any purported defect.”
Summary of this case from Alley Sports Bar, LLC v. SimplexGrinnell, LPOpinion
March 1, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).
Plaintiff has submitted no evidence which would demonstrate that the defendant Siegmeister was negligent in making any of the requested repairs to the meat compressing machine which caused plaintiff's injury, and in the absence of any evidence that Siegmeister had a contract with plaintiff's employer for routine or systematic maintenance of the machine, Siegmeister as an independent repairer/contractor, had no duty to install safety devices or to warn plaintiff's employer of any purported defect (Ayala v. V O Press Co., 126 A.D.2d 229, 235-236, citing Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co., 68 N.Y.2d 714, 717). Absent such duty or other proof of negligence, summary judgment was properly granted.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Tom, JJ.