From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gitlin v. David Storch, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1933
188 N.E. 61 (N.Y. 1933)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Gitlin v. Storch, Inc. (262 N.Y. 553), on opening the door to an apartment house a rolled up mat would catch and roll up higher.

Summary of this case from Wentz v. Newberry Company
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Submitted May 26, 1933

Decided June 13, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Alvin R. Cowan and Harold M. Phillips for appellant.

Harry A. Gair and Leon Shalov for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and CROUCH, JJ. Not sitting: HUBBS, J.

Summaries of

Gitlin v. David Storch, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1933
188 N.E. 61 (N.Y. 1933)

In Gitlin v. Storch, Inc. (262 N.Y. 553), on opening the door to an apartment house a rolled up mat would catch and roll up higher.

Summary of this case from Wentz v. Newberry Company
Case details for

Gitlin v. David Storch, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MILLIE GITLIN, Respondent, v. DAVID STORCH, INC., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 13, 1933

Citations

188 N.E. 61 (N.Y. 1933)
188 N.E. 61

Citing Cases

Wentz v. Newberry Company

Considering the whole case, it cannot be said that the court held that the mere presence of a grape skin on a…

Ordway v. Hilliard

The defendants owed the plaintiffs, their tenants, the duty of keeping said hallway in a reasonably safe…

4 Citing Cases