From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ginsburg, Feldman Bress v. Federal Energy

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 31, 1978
591 F.2d 752 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

Summary

affirming by an equally divided vote district court's judgment that guidelines and instructions for audits were within exemption 2

Summary of this case from Schwaner v. Department of Air Force

Opinion

No. 76-1759.

Argued En Banc April 6, 1978.

Decided October 31, 1978.

On Rehearing En Banc.

James Hamilton, Washington, D.C., with whom David Ginsburg and Fred W. Drogula, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Michael Kimmel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Earl J. Silbert, U.S. Atty., Rex E. Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard Schaitman and John K. Villa, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WRIGHT, Chief Judge, and BAZELON, McGOWAN, TAMM, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT

This cause came on to be heard by the court on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and briefs were filed herein by the parties and the cause was argued by counsel before the court sitting en banc.


The judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge, took no part in the decision of this case.


Summaries of

Ginsburg, Feldman Bress v. Federal Energy

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 31, 1978
591 F.2d 752 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

affirming by an equally divided vote district court's judgment that guidelines and instructions for audits were within exemption 2

Summary of this case from Schwaner v. Department of Air Force
Case details for

Ginsburg, Feldman Bress v. Federal Energy

Case Details

Full title:AINSBURG, FELDMAN BRESS, APPELLANT, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1978

Citations

591 F.2d 752 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Windels, Marx, Davies Ives v. Dept. of Commerce

dustrial Co., 513 F. Supp. 1100, 1143 (E.D.Pa. 1981), and in FOIA cases it has been held that disputes…

Dirksen v. U.S. D. of Health Human Serv

The interpretation of this exemption has been hotly contested. See, e.g., Department of the Air Force v.…