From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ginocchio v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 15, 2008
289 F. App'x 234 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 04-71894.

Submitted April 11, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 15, 2008.

Gail A. Dulay, Esquire, Law Office of Gail A. Dulay, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jem C. Sponzo, Esquire, Earle B. Wilson, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A76-274-955.

Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication arid is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Anita Docena Ginocchio ("Ginocchio") petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") that denied her application for adjustment of status and ordered her removed. The parties are familiar with the facts of the case and we repeat them here only to the extent necessary to explain our decision. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant Ginocchio's petition for review.

In Chain v. Mukasey, 537 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), we addressed the proper interpretation of § 245(d) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act ("INA"). We held that INA § 245(d) does not make K visa-holders automatically ineligible to adjust to conditional permanent resident status if they get divorced before their application for adjustment of status is adjudicated. We apply that holding here. Like the petitioner in Choin, Ginocchio married the person who filed the K visa petition on her behalf (her fiancé), and applied for adjustment of status based on that marriage. Thus, the BIA erred in concluding that Ginocchio's divorce made her ineligible for adjustment of status. We GRANT Ginocchio's petition and REMAND to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

PETITION GRANTED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Ginocchio v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 15, 2008
289 F. App'x 234 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Ginocchio v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Anita Docena GINOCCHIO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 15, 2008

Citations

289 F. App'x 234 (9th Cir. 2008)