From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 25, 1933
127 Ohio St. 402 (Ohio 1933)

Opinion

No. 23947

Decided October 25, 1933.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Judges equally divided.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Messrs. Bernsteen Bernsteen and Mr. J.E. Mathews, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Tolles, Hogsett Ginn, Mr. W.T. Kinder and Mr. Thomas O. Nevison, for defendant in error.


It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

JONES, MATTHIAS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

WEYGANDT, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 25, 1933
127 Ohio St. 402 (Ohio 1933)
Case details for

Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:GILVARY v. CUYAHOGA VALLEY RY. CO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 25, 1933

Citations

127 Ohio St. 402 (Ohio 1933)
188 N.E. 4

Citing Cases

Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co.

Where a carrier and employee had elected, in case of any injury to the employee while engaged in intrastate…