From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilliam v. County of Los Angeles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 6, 1994
37 F.3d 1505 (9th Cir. 1994)

Summary

holding inmate's allegations of overcrowded cells, inadequate and unsanitary shower facilities, lack of access to cleaning materials, inadequate heating, cooling, and ventilation, failure to provide clean clothing and bedding, inadequate opportunities for exercise, inadequate and poorly prepared food, confinement in a cell with drug addicts and mentally ill prisoners, and lack of access to current legal materials did not have a "mutually enforcing effect"

Summary of this case from Hancock v. Rickard

Opinion

No. 92-56006.

October 6, 1994.

C.D.Cal.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gilliam v. County of Los Angeles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 6, 1994
37 F.3d 1505 (9th Cir. 1994)

holding inmate's allegations of overcrowded cells, inadequate and unsanitary shower facilities, lack of access to cleaning materials, inadequate heating, cooling, and ventilation, failure to provide clean clothing and bedding, inadequate opportunities for exercise, inadequate and poorly prepared food, confinement in a cell with drug addicts and mentally ill prisoners, and lack of access to current legal materials did not have a "mutually enforcing effect"

Summary of this case from Hancock v. Rickard
Case details for

Gilliam v. County of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:Gilliam v. County of Los Angeles

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 1994

Citations

37 F.3d 1505 (9th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Snyder v. City of Alexandria

These claims are not time barred. For decisions applying Heck to allegations that exculpatory evidence was…

WSOU Invs. v. Salesforce, Inc.

But abuse of discretion is not the standard of review for objections to magistrate orders on non-dispositive…