From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillespie v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION 1:13-CV-00219 (W.D. La. Mar. 21, 2014)

Summary

noting that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in Social Security proceedings, and ALJs who conduct hearings have no evidentiary gate-keeping duties

Summary of this case from Bergeron v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 1:13-CV-00219

03-21-2014

CHARLES DAVID GILLESPIE, Appellant v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Appellee


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK


JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Gillespie's appeal is DENIED.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at ___, Louisiana, on this 21st day of March, 20l4.

_______________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gillespie v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION 1:13-CV-00219 (W.D. La. Mar. 21, 2014)

noting that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in Social Security proceedings, and ALJs who conduct hearings have no evidentiary gate-keeping duties

Summary of this case from Bergeron v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

explaining that "ALJs who conduct SSA hearings have no Daubert gate-keeping duty"

Summary of this case from Peltonovich v. Colvin
Case details for

Gillespie v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES DAVID GILLESPIE, Appellant v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 1:13-CV-00219 (W.D. La. Mar. 21, 2014)

Citing Cases

Treadaway v. Berryhill

See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1560(b)(2), 416.960(b)(2). Use of the DOT is widespread in Social Security cases in all…

Rodriguez v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

As to the issue of whether the VE was properly qualified as an expert, the Court notes that the “Federal…