From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gill v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 15, 2011
1:10-CV-985 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2011)

Summary

explaining that ALJ correctly did not assign weight to treating physician opinion that was dated over two years after date last insured and was not consistent with treatment notes from relevant time period

Summary of this case from Patterson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

1:10-CV-985

09-15-2011

LYNNE GILL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Office of Stephen J. Mastaitis, Jr. Attorney for Plaintiff SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of the General Counsel Region II Attorney for Defendant OF COUNSEL: Stephen J. Mastaitis, Jr. Suzanne M. Haynes, Esq. Thomas C. Gray, Esq. Special Assistant U.S. Attorney


(MAD/ATB)

APPEARANCES:

Office of Stephen J. Mastaitis, Jr.
Attorney for Plaintiff
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Office of the General Counsel
Region II
Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

Stephen J. Mastaitis, Jr.

Suzanne M. Haynes, Esq.

Thomas C. Gray, Esq.

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter, duly filed on the 29th day of August 2011. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.
2. The Commissioner is granted judgment on the pleadings and Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied.
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly.
4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2011

Albany, New York

Mae A. D'Agostino

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Gill v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 15, 2011
1:10-CV-985 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2011)

explaining that ALJ correctly did not assign weight to treating physician opinion that was dated over two years after date last insured and was not consistent with treatment notes from relevant time period

Summary of this case from Patterson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

treating source report completed two years after date last insured did not address plaintiff's condition during the relevant time period

Summary of this case from Patterson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Gill v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LYNNE GILL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

1:10-CV-985 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

When an ALJ uses a VE, the ALJ “must present the VE with a set of hypothetical facts to determine whether…

Ridley G. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

When an ALJ uses a VE, the ALJ “must present the VE with a set of hypothetical facts to determine whether…