From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilkey v. Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1930
154 S.E. 93 (N.C. 1930)

Opinion

(Filed 2 July, 1930.)

APPEAL by defendants from Sink, Special Judge, at April Term, 1930, of BUNCOMBE.

Alfred S. Barnard for plaintiff.

George Pennell, Charles N. Malone and Charles E. Jones for defendants.


(See Reynolds v. Asheville, ante, 212.)


Civil action to restrain the collection of an alleged illegal tax.

Judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.


This is a companion case to Reynolds v. Asheville, ante, 212, and is controlled by what was said in that case, the similarity of the fact situations in the two cases being such as to call for no distinguishment or further discussion. The legal questions involved are the same.

We are not unmindful of the apparent equity of appellants' position, considering the burdens assumed and benefits conferred by the extension of the city limits, but this is a matter which the Legislature is presumed to have considered, and the law is as it is written.

Affirmed.

CLARKSON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Gilkey v. Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1930
154 S.E. 93 (N.C. 1930)
Case details for

Gilkey v. Asheville

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD P. GILKEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 1, 1930

Citations

154 S.E. 93 (N.C. 1930)
154 S.E. 93

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

The tax assessor has no duty to assess for municipal taxes property which was not within the municipality on…