From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giles v. H.G. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida
May 3, 1961
129 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1961)

Opinion

No. 30877.

May 3, 1961.

Jack Clayton Giles, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


By petition for writ of habeas corpus, Giles alleges that when he was tried and sentenced to a term of two years in the State prison for the crime of escape he was an unmarried minor and that the State failed to comply with the provision of Section 932.38, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., regarding the notification of his parents or guardian. We issued the writ. The return of the respondent admits the essential allegations of the petition. We are, therefore, compelled to conclude that the petitioner is being illegally restrained of his liberty under the purported conviction of the crime of escape. He must be released from custody under said judgment. However, he is remanded to the custody of respondent pending appropriate disposition of the aforesaid charge of escape. See Kinard v. Cochran, Fla., 113 So.2d 843; Raggen v. Cochran, Fla., 126 So.2d 145, and Williams v. Cochran, Fla., 126 So.2d 887.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C.J., and TERRELL, HOBSON, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Giles v. H.G. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida
May 3, 1961
129 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1961)
Case details for

Giles v. H.G. Cochran

Case Details

Full title:JACK CLAYTON GILES, PETITIONER, v. H.G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 3, 1961

Citations

129 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1961)

Citing Cases

State v. Cochran

When the Orange County sentences were imposed, Roberts had completed serving the Polk County sentences. As…

Michell v. State

The ultimate question raised by this appeal may be stated as follows: Was it proper for the trial court,…