From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gildersleeve v. Leo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2000
274 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 10, 2000.

July 31, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Katherine Gildersleeve appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated July 8, 1999, which denied her motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and to dismiss the defendants' counterclaim insofar as asserted against her.

Gallagher Walker Bianco Plastaras, Mineola, N.Y. (Dominic P. Bianco of counsel), for appellant.

Frank V. Merlino, Garden City, N.Y. (Arthur B. Colligan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff Katherine Gildersleeve contributed to the accident by making a sudden stop (see, Maschka v. Newman, 262 A.D.2d 615, 616; Niemiec v. Jones, 237 A.D.2d 267), or whether she was faced with an emergency situation and, if so, whether her actions were reasonable and prudent in that context (see, Rivera v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 N.Y.2d 322, 327).


Summaries of

Gildersleeve v. Leo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2000
274 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Gildersleeve v. Leo

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE GILDERSLEEVE, APPELLANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFF, v. CATHERINE LEO, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 399

Citing Cases

Takle v. New York City Transit Authority

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The defendants New York City Transit…

Rosa v. Colonial Transit, Inc.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment.…