From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilday v. Hauchwit

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 20, 1967
226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1967 —

Decided February 20, 1967.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. John W. Hand argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Evans, Hand, Evans, Allabough Amoresano, attorneys; Mr. Brian J. McGrievy on the brief).


The judgment as to the defendant Carlo is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gaulkin and the matter is remanded to the Passaic County Court with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

Gilday v. Hauchwit

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 20, 1967
226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)
Case details for

Gilday v. Hauchwit

Case Details

Full title:ELSIE GILDAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUCILLE L. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT, AND…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 20, 1967

Citations

226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)
226 A.2d 834

Citing Cases

Suarez v. Dosky

" If this is indeed the correct interpretation, then a dramatically new change in the law has been achieved…

Steward v. Magnolia

den. 36 N.J. 144 (1961); Gilday v. Hauchwit, 91 N.J. Super. 233, 242 (App.Div. 1966), mod. 48 N.J. 557…