From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilchrist v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 31, 1917
75 So. 958 (Ala. 1917)

Opinion

8 Div. 15.

May 31, 1917.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Morgan County; James E. Horton, Jr., Chancellor.

Callahan Harris, of Decatur, for appellant. Sample Kilpatrick, of Cullman, for appellee.


We agree with the chancery court that while it may be conceded that Poteet was the agent of Mrs. Johnson and had authority to bind her by receiving payments on the mortgage indebtedness, the credit to Gilchrist for which a receipt was given in the first part of 1910 of $100 was not such a payment of the mortgage debt as would be binding on the mortgagee. It is evident that the consideration for the receipt was not such a payment in money as would be binding upon Mrs. Johnson, the mortgagee, but arose from a settlement of individual matters between Poteet and Gilchrist, and that the only money that passed between them was a few dollars for the purpose of striking a proper balance between the parties.

The decree of the chancery court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McCLELLAN, SAYRE, and GARDNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gilchrist v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 31, 1917
75 So. 958 (Ala. 1917)
Case details for

Gilchrist v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:GILCHRIST v. JOHNSON

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 31, 1917

Citations

75 So. 958 (Ala. 1917)
200 Ala. 200

Citing Cases

Tilton v. Boland

The texts accompany the above statements of the rule with the citation of many authorities. We shall make…

Michie v. Bradshaw

Michie v. Nebrig, 223 Ala. 175, 134 So. 665; Branscomb v. Fed. Land Bank, 215 Ala. 243, 110 So. 42; Fed. Land…