Opinion
May 2, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered April 30, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the cross motion by defendants limited partnership, its corporate general partner and the latter's principal for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff limited partner's derivative causes of action on behalf of the partnership, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
David Rosenberg, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
William R. Fried, for Defendants-Respondents.
TOM, J.P., ELLERIN, RUBIN, ANDRIAS, BUCKLEY, JJ.
The derivative causes of action were properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that he will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the limited partnership, in view of "the totality of the relationship" between himself and the individual defendant, his former son-in-law and business partner (G. A. Enters. v. Leisure Living Communities, 517 A.2d 24, 26). Plaintiff and the individual defendant are now manifestly hostile to each other on a personal level, and are currently litigating against each other in four actions; the first action was commenced by the individual defendant against plaintiff, and within approximately three months thereafter plaintiff commenced this action and two others against the individual defendant, strongly suggesting that the commencement of this action may have been inappropriately motivated by a desire to retaliate for the individual defendant's earlier commenced action or to obtain leverage therein (see, Steinberg v. Steinberg, 106 Misc.2d 720, 722, citing G. A. Enters. v. Leisure Living Communities, supra; see also, Sigfeld Realty v. Landsman, 234 A.D.2d 148; Mizel v. Feinberg, 227 A.D.2d 145).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.