From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilani v. Kaempfe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 27, 2011
331 S.W.3d 879 (Tex. App. 2011)

Summary

dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction after concluding that appellant's motion for new trial filed 31 days after signing of judgment was untimely and failed to extend appellate timetable

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Tex. Med. Liab. Ins. Underwriting Ass'n

Opinion

No. 05-10-00130-CV.

January 27, 2011.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 3-01731-09; John Barry, Judge.

Fredrick Gilani, Piano, TX, pro se.

Don P. Oglee, Little Elm, TX, pro se.

Martin Kaempfe, Little Elm, TX, pro se.

Before Justices MOSELEY, BRIDGES, and O'NEILL.


OPINION


On November 23, 2010, the Court sent a letter to appellant Fredrick Gilani questioning our jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, we questioned the timeliness of Gilani's notice of appeal. We requested that Gilani file, within ten days of the date of the letter, a jurisdictional brief explaining how this Court has jurisdiction. As of today's date, Gilani has not filed a jurisdictional brief.

A motion for new trial will serve to extend the appellate timetable if it is filed within thirty days of the date of the judgment. See TEX.R. Civ. P. 329b(a). In the absence of a timely filed motion for new trial, a notice of appeal is due thirty days from the date of judgment. See TEX. R.APP. P. 26.1. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX.R.APP. P. 25.1.

The final judgment in this case was signed on August 25, 2009. A motion for new trial was due on September 24, 2009. See TEX.R. CIV. P. 329b(a). Gilani filed an untimely motion for new trial on Friday, September 25, 2009. Because the motion for new trial was untimely, it did not extend the appellate timetable. Accordingly, Gilani's notice of appeal was due on September 24, 2009. Gilani filed his notice of appeal on October 23, 2009. The notice of appeal was untimely.

Because the notice of appeal was untimely, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.APP. P. 42.3(a).


Summaries of

Gilani v. Kaempfe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 27, 2011
331 S.W.3d 879 (Tex. App. 2011)

dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction after concluding that appellant's motion for new trial filed 31 days after signing of judgment was untimely and failed to extend appellate timetable

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Tex. Med. Liab. Ins. Underwriting Ass'n

dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction after concluding that appellant's motion for new trial filed 31 days after signing of judgment was untimely and failed to extend appellate timetable

Summary of this case from Coffee v. Coffee
Case details for

Gilani v. Kaempfe

Case Details

Full title:Fredrick GILANI, Appellant, v. Martin KAEMPFE and John P. Oglee, Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 27, 2011

Citations

331 S.W.3d 879 (Tex. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Signad, Ltd. v. City of Hudson

Thus, the motion was late and did not extend the time for filing the notice of appeal. See Hartley v. Esquire…

Robinson v. Tex. Med. Liab. Ins. Underwriting Ass'n

If the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Gilani v. Kaempfe,…