From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giddens v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
CASE NO. 7:10-CR-28 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 7:10-CR-28 (HL) CASE NO. 7:12-CV-90125

12-19-2012

RICKY GIDDENS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 142). The Magistrate Judge recommends that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 130) be dismissed and Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release (Doc. 134) be denied.

Petitioner has filed objections to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the objections, and after careful consideration, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate is dismissed. No certificate of appealability will be issued. Further, Petitioner's Request to Supplement Brief (Doc. 144) is denied, as the Magistrate Judge addressed Dorsey v. United States in making his recommendation, which has been adopted in full.

_________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

Giddens v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
CASE NO. 7:10-CR-28 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Giddens v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RICKY GIDDENS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 7:10-CR-28 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Newell v. United States

(no citation provided)); Giddens v. United States, 7:10-CR-28-001 HL, 2012 WL 6628411, at *2 (M.D. Ga. Nov.…