From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giddens v. Porras

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 29, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1763 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Civ. No. 05-1763 (JNE/RLE).

August 29, 2006


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated July 27, 2006, the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Pla intiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED.
2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Giddens v. Porras

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 29, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1763 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Giddens v. Porras

Case Details

Full title:Javeon Giddens, Plaintiff, v. Officers Porras, Lynch, Justin Merten…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

Civ. No. 05-1763 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

Roblero-Barrios v. Pingry

Even though the claimant in Foster allegedly suffered "nerve damage" from being handcuffed too tightly, the…

Gilmore v. Dubuc

Burns v. Office of Attorney Gen., No. 05-858, 2009 WL 825778, at *20 (D. Minn. Mar. 27, 2009) (analyzing…