From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 26, 2006
1:06CV00332, 6:93CR211-1 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 1:06CV00332, 6:93CR211-1.

July 26, 2006


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 17, 2006, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence [Pleading No. 1] be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obtain certification for this § 2255 application by filing a Motion for Authorization in the court of appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Gibson v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 26, 2006
1:06CV00332, 6:93CR211-1 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Gibson v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:VANCE MARCEL GIBSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jul 26, 2006

Citations

1:06CV00332, 6:93CR211-1 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Carter

Some district courts have interpreted § 3582 motions as § 2255 motions under Gonzalez's precedent as well.…