recognizing that applications of equitable doctrines to statutes of limitations are reviewed as factual determinations for clear error
Summary of this case from Takacs v. David E. Lewis, for Stone Pine Inv. Banking, LLC (In re Stone Pine Inv. Banking, LLC)93-9555.
May 13, 1994.
AFFIRMED.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
recognizing that applications of equitable doctrines to statutes of limitations are reviewed as factual determinations for clear error
Summary of this case from Takacs v. David E. Lewis, for Stone Pine Inv. Banking, LLC (In re Stone Pine Inv. Banking, LLC)noting that the IRS assessed penalties and interest in two years where the taxpayers, who were undergoing bankruptcy, did not file tax returns
Summary of this case from U.S. v. AlexanderFull title:GIBBS v. S.E.C
Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: May 13, 1994
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) advisory committee's note ("Relief may be justified, for example, if the applicable…
Mata v. Anderson(Emphasis added.).Cloyd v. Arthur Andersen Co., Inc., 25 F.3d 1056 (Table) (10th Cir.…