From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ghanem v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 7, 2006
929 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D06-1745.

June 7, 2006.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry E. Goldstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-19226 CF10D.

Michael D. Gelety, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed. See Gross v. State, 820 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (holding that trial court did not impose an illegal sentence when it applied the sentencing guidelines in effect at the beginning of appellant's criminal enterprise rather than those in effect at the end, because there was no statute or other rule that addressed the issue of which guidelines to apply to a continuing criminal enterprise); Gross v. State, 728 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that convictions for grand theft charges, which were the predicate offenses for RICO conviction, did not violate double jeopardy); Hatchett v. State, 766 So.2d 499 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (stating that where appellant's claim is that use of wrong guidelines affected his gain time, appellant must first exhaust his administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections).

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ghanem v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 7, 2006
929 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Ghanem v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mohamed Ali GHANEM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 7, 2006

Citations

929 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)