From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerlach v. Edelmeyer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1882
88 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1882)

Summary

In Gerlach v. Edelmeyer (47 N.Y. Super. Ct. 293; affd. without opinion, 88 N.Y. 645) it was said: "Dittmer, through whose negligence the accident happened, was the defendants' servant, paid by and controlled by them.

Summary of this case from Baldwin v. Abraham

Opinion

Argued January 27, 1882

Decided February 7, 1882

Hugh Reavy for appellant.

Nathaniel C. Moak for respondent.


Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., absent, and FINCH and TRACY, JJ., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Gerlach v. Edelmeyer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1882
88 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1882)

In Gerlach v. Edelmeyer (47 N.Y. Super. Ct. 293; affd. without opinion, 88 N.Y. 645) it was said: "Dittmer, through whose negligence the accident happened, was the defendants' servant, paid by and controlled by them.

Summary of this case from Baldwin v. Abraham
Case details for

Gerlach v. Edelmeyer

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTA GERLACH, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . JOHN H. EDELMEYER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1882

Citations

88 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1882)

Citing Cases

Williams v. New York Telephone Co.

In Michael v. Stanton (3 Hun, 462), where a master sent his servant with a team to work for defendant, and…

Stewart v. California Imp. Co.

The corporation, and not the city, is liable for the negligence of the engineer. (Coyle v.Pierrepont, 37 Hun.…