From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gepp v. International Harvester Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1992
186 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 13, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).


It was within the discretion of the court to vacate the default of the third-party defendant (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). In the circumstances presented, the bankruptcy-dissolution of the defaulting party, the default was excusable. This is analogous to law office failure (Bayer v Domino Media, 147 A.D.2d 413). Further, the court properly found a meritorious defense in that there does not appear to be a basis for full indemnification as awarded by the default judgment, and a lack of prejudice to the third-party plaintiffs as the main action has not yet been tried.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Gepp v. International Harvester Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1992
186 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Gepp v. International Harvester Co.

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS GEPP et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 288

Citing Cases

Citibank v. Olson

Under these circumstances, we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting…

Capitol Distrib. v. Ch. Ave. Wine Liquor

Thereafter, the Supreme Court denied Mul-Rob's motion to renew its motion to vacate its default. To vacate a…