From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, O.S.H.A

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 5, 1986
788 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2758. Summary Calendar.

May 5, 1986.

Charles A. George, pro se.

Henry K. Oncken, U.S. Atty., Nancy K. Pecht, James R. Gough, Linda M. Cipriani, Frank A. Conforti, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before GEE, RANDALL, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


The district court enjoys a broad discretion in determining whether to dismiss an action for ineffective service of process, as it did in this instance. C L Farms v. Federal Crop Insurance Corp., 771 F.2d 407 (8th Cir. 1985). It is undisputed that in this attempted action against the United States, the appellant failed to serve the Attorney General, as required by Rule 4(d)(4), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In view of this, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

George v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, O.S.H.A

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 5, 1986
788 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

George v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, O.S.H.A

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. GEORGE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 5, 1986

Citations

788 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

White v. NBA Props., Inc.

Despite the importance of proper service, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held…

Smith v. Womans Hosp.

However, notwithstanding the importance of proper service, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit…