From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geoppo v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 1, 2019
283 So. 3d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D18-4425

10-01-2019

Stephen GEOPPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Stephen Geoppo, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Stephen Geoppo, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Winokur, J.

Stephen Geoppo appeals the trial court's summary denial of his post-conviction motion alleging that his life sentence is illegal pursuant to Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) and Atwell v. State , 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). We reject Geoppo's claim and affirm. In 1989, Geoppo pled guilty to first-degree murder and armed robbery with a deadly weapon. The trial court sentenced Geoppo to life in prison with the possibility of parole after twenty-five years for the murder and five years for the robbery. Geoppo did not pursue a direct appeal.

In 2017, Geoppo filed a post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 claiming that his life sentence was unconstitutional because the sentencing court had not considered his youth. Specifically, Geoppo argues that his life sentence violates Miller 's prohibition on automatic life sentences for minors, as well as Atwell 's finding that a mandatory life sentence with the possibility of parole for juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment. The trial court summarily denied his motion.

The Florida Supreme Court recently abrogated its decision in Atwell holding that if a juvenile offender's life sentence includes parole eligibility, then there is no Miller violation. Franklin v. State , 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018). In any event, this Court has emphasized that Miller does not apply to adult offenders. Marshall v. State , 277 So.3d 1149, 2019 WL 3980788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (citing Romero v. State , 105 So. 3d 550, 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ). Geoppo was nineteen years old at the time of his offenses. Therefore, Miller is inapplicable to his life sentence. Accordingly, Geoppo's life sentence does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment and we affirm the trial court's denial of his post-conviction motion.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Geoppo v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 1, 2019
283 So. 3d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Geoppo v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN GEOPPO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

283 So. 3d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

State v. Lauderdale (In re Lauderdale)

This court's majority cites a number of decisions wherein federal appeals courts held that a sentencing court…