From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentry v. Ebersole

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 8, 2003
837 A.2d 924 (Md. 2003)

Opinion

No. 84, September Term, 2003.

December 8, 2003.

Lisa J. Smith of Saul E. Kerpelman Associates, Baltimore, for petitioners.

Kathleen M. Bustraan of Lord Whip, Baltimore, Catherine A. Potthast of Nolan, Plumhoff Williams, Towson, for respondents.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., and RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and JOHN C. ELDRIDGE (retired, specially assigned), JJ.


The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 8th day of December, 2003,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to vacate the summary judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and remand the case to the Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with Brooks v. Lewin, 378 Md. 70, 835 A.2d 616 (2003). Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by the Respondents.


Summaries of

Gentry v. Ebersole

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 8, 2003
837 A.2d 924 (Md. 2003)
Case details for

Gentry v. Ebersole

Case Details

Full title:ALISHA GENTRY, A MINOR, ETC. et al., v. RICHARD EBERSOLE, et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 8, 2003

Citations

837 A.2d 924 (Md. 2003)
837 A.2d 924

Citing Cases

Polakoff v. Turner

The real question is which law is applicable on direct appellate review. Moreover, our per curiam decision in…