From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentile v. MCA Records, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 2005
17 A.D.3d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5702.

April 26, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 9, 2004, dismissing the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Jerome Greenberg, New York, for appellant.

Proskauer Rose LLP, New York (Frank P. Scibilia of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.


This action, asserting claims virtually identical to those dismissed in a prior federal action ( Gentile v. Jobete Music Co., Inc., 1996 WL 148427, 1996 US Dist LEXIS 4011 [SD NY, Apr. 2, 1996], affd 122 F3d 1056 [table; text at 1997 WL 559850, 1997 US App LEXIS 23614 (2d Cir 1997)]) and, in any event, premised upon identical underlying transactions, is barred under the doctrine of res judicata ( see O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Gentile v. MCA Records, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 2005
17 A.D.3d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Gentile v. MCA Records, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. GENTILE, Appellant, v. MCA RECORDS, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 26, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 407

Citing Cases

Gold v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.

Our review is particularly warranted given the preclusive effects of such a ruling over future claims. See,…