From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Riveters, Inc. v. Morse Chain Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1958
6 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

July 9, 1958

Appeal from the Erie Trial Term.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Kimball, Williams, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: While there was ample proof of a breach of warranty by the defendant, with respect to the clutches sold by it to the plaintiff, the proof did not adequately establish the extent of the defendant's wrong and the amount of the resulting damage. It is impossible to determine from the record how many of the clutches which the plaintiff replaced for purchasers of the Martin dry cleaning machines had been defectively manufactured by the defendant and how many of them had failed because of improper assembly of the machines by the plaintiff or because of improper operation or maintenance by the customers. Also, there was not sufficient proof of loss of profits due to alleged injury to the good will of the plaintiff to enable the jury to make a fair estimate of the amount of the loss (cf. Moran v. Standard Oil Co., 211 N.Y. 187, 193-195). All concur.


Summaries of

General Riveters, Inc. v. Morse Chain Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1958
6 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

General Riveters, Inc. v. Morse Chain Company

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL RIVETERS, INC., Respondent, v. MORSE CHAIN COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Morse Chain Co. v. Formsprag Co.

The New York case was tried and appealed three times. Each time a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff…