From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 4, 1975
228 N.W.2d 261 (Minn. 1975)

Opinion

No. 45192.

April 4, 1975.

Taxation — refund of tax paid on exempt personal property — interest allowed.

Certiorari upon the relation of the commissioner of taxation to review a decision of the Tax Court determining that certain tools and equipment owned by respondent, General Mills, Inc., are exempt from taxation and that it is entitled to refunds with interest from the date the taxes were paid. Affirmed.

Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, and Arthur J. Glassman, Special Assistant Attorney General, for relator.

Johnson Eastlund and Ralph W. Peterson, for respondent.

Heard before Peterson, MacLaughlin, and Yetka, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


This case comes to us on writ of certiorari from the Minnesota Tax Court and is the third time this court has been asked to consider issues arising from an attempt by Hennepin County to impose a tax on certain personal property owned by respondent.

In the first appeal, General Mills, Inc. v. Commr. of Taxation, 294 Minn. 175, 199 N.W.2d 636 (1972), we found the aforesaid property exempt from taxation. In the second appeal, General Mills, Inc. v. State, 303 Minn. 66, 226 N.W.2d 296 (1975), we held that respondent was entitled to interest on moneys paid under the invalid assessments.

Respondent had paid the challenged tax payable in the years of 1969 through 1972 under protest. These funds have been refunded without interest.

The substance of the issues raised in the instant appeal is not readily apparent. Indeed, the parties are in disagreement as to whether this court must rule on respondent's right to interest or whether the Tax Court has the power to order the commissioner of revenue to "certify" to county officials that respondent is entitled to interest.

We need not rule on that latter question. It is clear that respondent is entitled to 6-percent interest on its personal property tax refund. General Mills, Inc. v. State, supra. We so hold.

Moreover, there comes a time when litigation must end. We believe that time has arrived in this case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

General Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 4, 1975
228 N.W.2d 261 (Minn. 1975)
Case details for

General Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL MILLS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 4, 1975

Citations

228 N.W.2d 261 (Minn. 1975)
228 N.W.2d 261

Citing Cases

Doyle v. Klein

Loo, 520 N.W.2d at 743-44; see also id. at 744 n.2 (holding that, even where the law-of-the-case doctrine (or…