From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Electric v. Atlantic City Electric

U.S.
May 13, 1963
373 U.S. 909 (1963)

Summary

invoking the assignment of income doctrine to require a cash-basis corporation to recognize gain from a Section 337 sale of completed contracts

Summary of this case from Midland-Ross Corp., Tr. of Sur. Com. v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 912.

May 13, 1963.


ORDERS

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. J. Courtney Ivey, Francis C. Reed, S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., Harold F. McGuire, Porter R. Chandler, Robert W. Murray, Edgar E. Barton, Edward E. Rigney, William J. Junkerman, Joseph W. Burns, J. Francis Hayden, Robert C. Barnard, Ernest S. Meyers, William C. Blind, Albert R. Connelly and Jesse Climenko for petitioners. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Milton Handler, James B. Henry, Jr., Bethuel M. Webster, David G. Bress, Merrell E. Clark, Jr., Ralph Warren Sullivan, Robert W. Gelfman, Harold E. Kohn, Sidney Goldstein, Nathaniel Fensterstock, Leo Larkin, Randall J. LeBoeuf, Jr., Horace R. Lamb, Mathias L. Spiegel and Clifford D. Root for respondents. Reported below: 312 F. 2d 236.


Summaries of

General Electric v. Atlantic City Electric

U.S.
May 13, 1963
373 U.S. 909 (1963)

invoking the assignment of income doctrine to require a cash-basis corporation to recognize gain from a Section 337 sale of completed contracts

Summary of this case from Midland-Ross Corp., Tr. of Sur. Com. v. U.S.
Case details for

General Electric v. Atlantic City Electric

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. et al. v. ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 13, 1963

Citations

373 U.S. 909 (1963)

Citing Cases

Storz v. C. I. R

Therefore, the question to be resolved on this appeal is whether the assignment of income doctrine applies so…

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington

The court below held that it is. Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co., 2 Cir., 312 F.2d 236…