Summary
Holding "that the appellants’ inability to know in advance the exact number of signatures required in order to place their initiative measures on the ballot" did not infringe upon their right to free speech under the First Amendment because it "in no way restricted their ability to circulate petitions or otherwise engage in political speech."
Summary of this case from SD Voice v. NoemOpinion
No. 97-1151.
March 9, 1998.
ORDER
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 122 F 3d 815.