From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geiger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 9, 2003
861 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 1D03-4533.

Opinion filed December 9, 2003.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus — Original Jurisdiction.

William Geiger, pro se, petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.


William Geiger petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his plea to criminal charges was involuntary and raising other challenges to his conviction. This petition must be denied because petitioner has an adequate remedy through a motion for postconviction relief in the circuit court. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(h). In fact, Geiger's petition suggests that he has already filed such a motion but the circuit court has been slow in disposing of the matter. Our denial of the habeas corpus petition is therefore without prejudice to Geiger's right to petition this court for a writ of mandamus if the circuit court does not act on the motion within a reasonable time. See Bernard v. State, 734 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Geiger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 9, 2003
861 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Geiger v. State

Case Details

Full title:William GEIGER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 9, 2003

Citations

861 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Crow v. State

The Legislature could not define the circumstances in which a writ of habeas corpus could be issued because…