From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GE Engine Services UNC Holding I, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 12, 2002
53 F. App'x 812 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion


53 Fed.Appx. 812 (9th Cir. 2002) GE ENGINE SERVICES UNC HOLDING I, INC.; UNC Pacific Airmotive Corporation, Plaintiffs--Appellants, v. CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY; Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company; Travelers Indemnity Company; Travelers Casualty & Surety Company; Allstate Insurance Company; Northbrook Insurance, Defendants--Appellees. No. 01-57102. D.C. No. CV-01-02551-ER. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 12, 2002

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2002.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Insured brought suit against its various insurers, seeking coverage for its liability with regard to the actions and property of a company that insured had acquired. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, Edward Rafeedie, J., entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of insurers. Insured appealed. The Court of Appeals held that, under California law, insurance policies did not cover damages that occur to companies that were acquired by insured after the policies had expired.

Affirmed.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Edward Rafeedie, District Judge, Presiding.

Before D.W. NELSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.

The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

GE Engine Services UNC Holding I Inc. ("UNC") and UNC Pacific Airmotive Corporation ("UNC-PAC") (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal the district court's grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of Century Indemnity Company, the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, the Travelers Indemnity Company, the Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Allstate Insurance Company, and Northbrook Insurance (collectively "Insurers"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Dismissals under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) are reviewed de novo. Nelson v. City of Irvine, 143 F.3d 1196, 1200 (9th Cir.1998). A judgment on the

Page 813.

pleadings is properly granted when, taking all the allegations in the pleadings as true, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id.

This diversity case is governed by California law. Under California law, insurance policies do not cover damages that occur to companies that are acquired by an insured after the policy has expired. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., v, Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 45 Cal.App.4th 1, 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 690 (Cal.Ct.App.1996); Cooper Cos., Inc. v. Transcontinental Ins. Co., 31 Cal.App.4th 1094, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 508 (Cal.Ct.App.1995). Here, all of the Insurers' polices expired prior to UNC's acquisition of UNC-PAC. UNC's liability for UNC-PAC's actions and property are derived solely as a result of its acquisition of the latter. Accordingly, coverage was properly denied under the Insurers' policies.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

GE Engine Services UNC Holding I, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 12, 2002
53 F. App'x 812 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

GE Engine Services UNC Holding I, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.

Case Details

Full title:GE ENGINE SERVICES UNC HOLDING I, INC.; UNC Pacific Airmotive Corporation…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 2002

Citations

53 F. App'x 812 (9th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

Weiby v. Marfell

The rights of the plaintiff herein are no greater. Curran v. Connecticut Indemnity Co. of New Haven, 1941,…