From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GAZZAM v. BUILDING SERVICE ETC

The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc
Jul 1, 1949
34 Wn. 2d 38 (Wash. 1949)

Opinion

No. 30823.

July 1, 1949.

APPEAL AND ERROR — HEARING AND REHEARING — DIVIDED COURT. Where, on appeal, a majority of the supreme court is unable to reach a definite decision, the judgment of the trial court will stand affirmed.

See 3 Am. Jur. 671.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, Sutton, J., entered September 20, 1948, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for injunctive relief and for damages, after a trial on the merits to the court. Affirmed.

Theodore S. Turner, for appellant.

L. Presley Gill, for respondents.



The appeal here present is from a second trial of the issues involved in Gazzam v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262, 29 Wn.2d 488, 188 P.2d 97. In that case, we reversed a judgment of nonsuit and instructed the court to retry the case. In obedience to that instruction, the case was tried again, and a judgment entered in favor of Gazzam. Mr. Gazzam and the Union then appealed. The judgment provided for recovery of five hundred dollars as damages occasioned by the picketing of Mr. Gazzam's place of business. The trial court refused to allow damages caused by the fact that Gazzam's place of business had been placed on the unfair list. [1] The members of this court have been unable to agree. Four judges were of the view that the judgment should be modified to the extent of allowing appellant Gazzam recovery of damages occasioned by picketing and by being placed on the unfair list. Three judges were of the opinion that recovery should only be allowed for damages occasioned by the picketing, and two judges were of the opinion that no damages should be allowed either for picketing or placing on the unfair list.

Inasmuch as a majority of the court has not reached a definite decision, the judgment of the trial court will stand affirmed.

August 12, 1949. Petition for rehearing denied.


Summaries of

GAZZAM v. BUILDING SERVICE ETC

The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc
Jul 1, 1949
34 Wn. 2d 38 (Wash. 1949)
Case details for

GAZZAM v. BUILDING SERVICE ETC

Case Details

Full title:W.L. GAZZAM, Appellant, v. BUILDING SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION…

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc

Date published: Jul 1, 1949

Citations

34 Wn. 2d 38 (Wash. 1949)
34 Wash. 2d 38
207 P.2d 699

Citing Cases

Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256

Pa. Stats. Ann., tit. 43, § 211.1-211.12, is a comprehensive Labor Relations Act. Washington: Gazzam v.…

Inter. Steam. Co. v. Mar. Eng. Bene. Assn

In Gazzam v. Building Service etc. Union, 29 Wn.2d 488, 500, 188 P.2d 97, 103, 11 A.L.R. 2d 1330, 1337, the…