From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaudette v. Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire
Jul 2, 1906
64 A. 667 (N.H. 1906)

Opinion

Decided July 2, 1906.

CASE, to recover for injuries resulting in the death of Philip Gaudette, the plaintiff's intestate, who accidentally fell into a vat of hot alkaline solution while at work in the defendants' repair yard at Keene. The defendants' motion for a nonsuit was granted, and the plaintiff excepted. Transferred from the October term, 1905, of the superior court by Peaslee, J.

Joseph Madden, for the plaintiff.

John E. Allen and Streeter Hollis, for the defendants.


The motion was properly granted. The deceased was an intelligent man and was familiar with the surroundings and methods of doing business. There was no evidence that the defendants' knowledge of the danger from which the injuries resulted was, or could have been, superior to that of the plaintiff's intestate. Dube v. Gay, 69 N.H. 670. Whether rules should have been adopted by the defendants, which if enforced would have prevented the leaving of the pair of wheels near the southwesterly corner of the vat into which the deceased fell, is immaterial, because there was no evidence tending to show that the presence of the wheels caused or contributed to his fall.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.


Summaries of

Gaudette v. Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire
Jul 2, 1906
64 A. 667 (N.H. 1906)
Case details for

Gaudette v. Railroad

Case Details

Full title:GAUDETTE, Adm'x, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire

Date published: Jul 2, 1906

Citations

64 A. 667 (N.H. 1906)
64 A. 667

Citing Cases

Dziedzie v. Company

If deficient intelligence to the defendant's knowledge be found as a fact, the duty to use due care for the…

Ahern v. Company

Whether they can, or cannot, depends upon the answer to the inquiry, whether upon the evidence it could…