From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gates v. Rutledge

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 19, 1979
261 S.E.2d 757 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

58340.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979.

DECIDED OCTOBER 19, 1979.

Custody. Troup Juvenile Court. Before Judge Quillian.

Charlie Will Gates, pro se.

Franklin H. Thornton, H. J. Thomas, Jr., R. Michael Key, for appellees.

Mr. and Mrs. J. L. Rutledge, pro se.


Gates has filed a pro se appeal from an order of the Juvenile Court of Troup County awarding custody of his four minor children to the appellees (the maternal grandparents) during the school year and to his mother, Mrs. Mary Alice Gates, during summer vacation. No appeal was filed by Mrs. Gates. Appellant, who killed the children's mother and is currently serving a term in prison, was not a party on the juvenile court level and the appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal because of his lack of standing.

"It will be accepted as elementary, that no person is entitled to prosecute a writ of error for the reversal of a judgment, unless that person was a party to the proceeding in which the judgment complained of was rendered." Swift v. Thomas, 101 Ga. 89, 91 (1) ( 28 S.E. 618) (1897); Ga. Music Operators Assn. v. Fulton County, 184 Ga. 348 (1, 2) ( 191 S.E. 117) (1937); U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Farris, 146 Ga. App. 177 ( 245 S.E.2d 868) (1978); Code Ann. § 6-802. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss must be granted.

Appeal dismissed. Deen, C. J., and Shulman, J., concur.


SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979 — DECIDED OCTOBER 19, 1979.


Summaries of

Gates v. Rutledge

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 19, 1979
261 S.E.2d 757 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Gates v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:GATES v. RUTLEDGE et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 19, 1979

Citations

261 S.E.2d 757 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
151 Ga. App. 844

Citing Cases

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Segan

However, it is also true that Travelers was made a party to the action below when the trial court entered…

State of Georgia v. Upton

"`It will be accepted as elementary, that no person is entitled to prosecute a writ of error for the reversal…