From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrow v. Lincoln Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 7, 1934
152 Misc. 423 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

June 7, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Joseph Greenhill, for the appellant.

Elias Garrow, for the respondent.


There being issues of fact as to whether the policy was procured through fraud, it was error to award summary judgment in this action for the cancellation value. The statute (Insurance Law, § 122) gives no right of action based on a policy procured through fraud.

Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, motion for summary judgment denied, and motion to consolidate actions granted.

All concur; present, CALLAHAN, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Garrow v. Lincoln Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 7, 1934
152 Misc. 423 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Garrow v. Lincoln Fire Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ELIAS GARROW, Respondent, v. LINCOLN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 423 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 492

Citing Cases

First Tr. Deposit Co. v. Middlesex Mut. F. Ins. Co.

However, the assignment of a policy presupposes that there is a genuine policy existing and in the case…