From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrow v. Garrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 17, 1978
61 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

February 17, 1978

Appeal from the Onondaga County Family Court.

Present — Moule, J.P., Simons, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Onondaga County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order committing him to the Onondaga County Correctional Facility for a term of six months for violating an order of protection. At the hearing for violation of such order, although the court informed respondent that he could be represented by an attorney, he was neither informed of his right to have an adjournment to confer with counsel nor informed of his right to have counsel assigned if he was financially unable to obtain one (Family Ct Act, § 262). In light of all the circumstances disclosed in the record we find that respondent should have been clearly informed of his right to representation at the hearing.


Summaries of

Garrow v. Garrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 17, 1978
61 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Garrow v. Garrow

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY GARROW, Respondent, v. DANIEL B. GARROW, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1978

Citations

61 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Tenants Assocs. v. Costello

gnized that in most civil proceedings, a litigant does not have a right to assigned counsel, even if indigent…

Matter of Williams v. Williams

In the proceeding at bar, the Family Court inquired of appellant as to whether he needed an attorney.…