From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrison v. Minn. Dep't of Revenue

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 6, 2020
No. 19-3270 (8th Cir. Jul. 6, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-3270

07-06-2020

Peter Garrison Plaintiff - Appellant v. Minnesota Department of Revenue of the State of Minnesota; Linda Craigie, individually and in her capacity as Supervisor for the Out-of-State East Unit; Pam Evans, individually and in her capacity as Director of the Sales and Use Tax Division; Kathy Zieminski, individually and in her capacity as Director of Human Resources Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota [Unpublished] Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

In this employment discrimination action, Peter Garrison appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment, based on a release in a settlement agreement. Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (reviewing de novo a grant of summary judgment); see also Pilon v. Univ. of Minn., 710 F.2d 466, 468 (8th Cir. 1983) (voluntary release bars future action on all claims covered by release). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. --------


Summaries of

Garrison v. Minn. Dep't of Revenue

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 6, 2020
No. 19-3270 (8th Cir. Jul. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Garrison v. Minn. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Peter Garrison Plaintiff - Appellant v. Minnesota Department of Revenue of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 6, 2020

Citations

No. 19-3270 (8th Cir. Jul. 6, 2020)