From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrett v. Woody

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Apr 16, 2008
Civil Action No. 3:07cv286 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:07cv286.

April 16, 2008


ORDER


By Order entered herein on February 15, 2008 (Docket No. 49), the pending Motion For Summary Judgment (Docket No. 35) was referred to Magistrate Judge Dennis W. Dohnal for report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 66) entered herein on March 21, 2008, the defendant's Objections To Report And Recommendation (Docket No. 67), the Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Objections To Report And Recommendation (Docket No. 68) and having considered the record and the Report and Recommendation and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The defendant's objections are overruled;

(2) The Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED to the extent that it holds that there are genuine disputes of material fact that preclude summary judgment;

(3) The defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (Docket No. 35) is denied; and

(4) The parties are to contact the Court no later than April 22, 2008 to schedule a time for a conference call for the purpose of scheduling a trial date.

The issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garrett v. Woody

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Apr 16, 2008
Civil Action No. 3:07cv286 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Garrett v. Woody

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GARRETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHERIFF C.T. WOODY, in his official…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division

Date published: Apr 16, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:07cv286 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2008)

Citing Cases

Emami v. Bolden

Id. "[W]hether the comparators presented are similarly situated in all relevant respects" is, at least after…